Exploring reductions in London Underground passenger journeys following the July 2005 bombings.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We examine the reduction in London Underground passenger journeys in response to the July 2005 bombings. Using entrance data for London Underground stations between 2001 and 2007, we incorporate demand and supply factors in a multivariate time-series regression model to estimate changes in passenger journeys between different Underground lines. We find that passenger journeys fell by an average of 8.3% for the 4 months following the attacks. This amounts to an overall reduction of 22.5 million passenger journeys for that period. Passenger journeys returned to predicted levels during September 2005, yet we find evidence of reduced travel until June 2006. Our estimates controlled for other factors, including reduced Underground service provision due to damage from the attacks, economic conditions, and weather, yet substantial reductions in passenger journeys remained. Around 82% of passenger journey reductions following the 2005 attacks cannot be attributed to supply-side factors or demand-side factors such as economic conditions, weather, or the summer school-break alone. We suggest that this reduction may partially be due to an increased perception of the risk of Underground travel after the attacks.
منابع مشابه
Enduring consequences of terrorism: 7-month follow-up survey of reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005.
BACKGROUND Terrorist attacks can have psychological effects on the general public. AIMS To assess the medium-term effects of the July 2005 London bombings on the general population in London and to identify risk factors for persistent effects. METHOD We telephoned 1010 Londoners 11-13 days after the bombings to assess stress levels, perceived threat and travel intentions. Seven months later...
متن کاملPsychological impact upon London Ambulance Service of the 2005 bombings.
BACKGROUND This study was conducted following the London bombings of 7 July 2005. AIMS To assess the psychological impact of the 2005 London bombings on London Ambulance Service (LAS) personnel, risk factors for the development of psychological ill-health and employee awareness of post incident support. METHODS A total of 525 LAS personnel involved in the bombings, and a control group of un...
متن کاملSpatial Layout Planning in Sub-Surface Rail Station Design for Effective Fire Evacuation
INTRODUCTION Underground stations can broadly be divided into two methods of construction: cut and cover (i.e. excavating a trench and recovering) and tunnelling. The station layout is mostly comprised of the areas that are common to all stations and their spatial planning must be set out with a thorough understanding of passenger circulation patterns. The station components, namely the ticket ...
متن کاملRemaking multiculturalism after 7/7
Such optimism would have struck some people as foolish at any time, but after the London bombings of 7 July and the abortive bombings of 21 July, it must strike many more as completely misguided. In particular, the fact that most of the individuals involved were born and/or brought up in Britain – a country that had given them or their parents a refuge from persecution, fear or poverty and a gu...
متن کاملAnalysis of the differences in travel behaviour between Pay As You Go and season ticket holders using smart card data
This paper establishes several approaches of assessing whether the use of different fare payment options affect passenger travel behaviour. The analysis compares the behavioural traits of season ticket (Travelcard) holders against those who travel on a Pay As You Go (PAYG) basis, on the London Underground over a fourmonth period. The regularity of passenger journeys is considered through the ex...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
دوره 31 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011